After allegedly overfeeding ‘Gordy’ a Texas couple’s pet beta fish, Prestigious Pets discovered themselves on the receiving finish of a one-star Yelp review. As it typically does within the United States, this led to one million greenback lawsuit.

Among different allegations, Prestigious Pets claimed the couple violated its non-disparagement clause and defamed the corporate on Yelp in final yr’s review. The firm additionally made the assertion that the review amounted to libel, as overfeeding a fish is akin to animal cruelty — a criminal offense in all states.

A new era of tech events has begun

We’re back in New York this November for the 4th edition of our growth-focused technology event.

Here’s the review that began all of it:

The one star is for probably harming my fish, in any other case it might have been two stars. We have a digital camera on the bowl and we watched the water go from clear to cloudy. There was a layer of meals on the underside from method an excessive amount of being put in it. Even in case you don’t have fish, you need to be in a position to see the change within the bowl and cease placing in meals. Better but, ask us how a lot to feed in case you are not sure.

It’s painful, however I’m going to gloss proper over the truth that a pair had a nanny cam arrange to monitor their pet fish.

Today, Judge Jim Jordan dismissed the lawsuit. He additionally ordered the pet store to pay the couple’s legal professionals as well as to imposing sanctions ‘sufficient to deter them from bringing similar actions’ towards Prestigious Pets’ attorneys.

Hopefully we will all sleep at night time understanding justice has been served.

Gordy the fish declined to remark.

Judge tosses lawsuit over 1-star Yelp review for overfeeding pet fish
on Ars Technica

Read subsequent:

Bill Nye is bringing his bow tie to Netflix

Source link