The ongoing Yelp vs. Google battle continues: Once once more, the consumer-generated assessment website is accusing the search behemoth of scraping content material off Yelp, primarily pictures, to make use of within the search outcomes it provides Googlers. The apply is in direct violation of a 2013 regulatory settlement between Google and different corporations, which stemmed from a 2012 grievance filed by Yelp with the Federal Trade Commission. At the time, Yelp’s argument targeted on two main factors: that Google unfairly used different websites’ content material with a view to higher its personal merchandise (like Google Places and search outcomes), and excluded competitor leads to a “search bias.” The settlement — which noticed Google agreeing to cease scraping different websites’ content material in the event that they selected to choose out — was referred to as by some a mere “slap on the wrist.”

And based on Yelp, Google’s at it once more. The Wall Street Journal studies a current inner investigation discovered that “over one hour, Google pulled images from Yelp’s servers nearly 386,000 times for business listings in Google Maps.” In different phrases, Googling a restaurant may nonetheless end in a number of Yelp-owned pictures popping up.

“This is a flagrant violation of Google’s promises to the FTC,” Yelp’s public coverage chief Luther Lowe stated in a letter of grievance to the Federal Trade Commission, “and the FTC should reopen the Google case immediately.”

Google critics — Yelp among the many loudest — argue that it’s a sample of conduct. In 2014, Yelp once more accused Google of prioritizing its personal search outcomes, even in consumer searches that included the phrase “Yelp.” Similar accusations, from Yelp and different corporations, arose once more in 2015; in a single occasion, Google blamed a bug for outcomes that buried Yelp outcomes.

The public feud between the 2 corporations started in earnest in 2009, after Google failed to accumulate Yelp; Google later snatched up the assessment website Zagat, which it tried to combine into Google+ (with various outcomes). Once Zagat was within the image, Yelp started arguing that search outcomes have been giving precedence to Zagat listings; as lately as August of final yr, that they had yet one more instance that would act as ammunition.

Elsewhere, regulators appear to agree. Earlier this yr, the European Union fined Google a report-breaking $2.7 billion, ruling that its “search bias” was certainly giving Google an unfair benefit.

• Google Rival Yelp Claims Search Giant Broke Promise Made to Regulators [WSJ]
• All Yelp Coverage [E]

Source link